Civil Liberties, From The Web, Government

Arguing that the standards are excessively and unconstitutionally vague, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the FCC’s broadcast indecency policy earlier this week:

[T]he absence of reliable guidance in the FCC’s standards chills a vast…

From The Web, Government

Arguing that the standards are excessively and unconstitutionally vague, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the FCC’s broadcast indecency policy earlier this week:

[T]he absence of reliable guidance in the FCC’s standards chills a vast amount of protected speech dealing with some of the most important and universal themes in art and literature. Sex and the magnetic power of sexual attraction are surely among the most predominant themes in the study of humanity since the Trojan War. The digestive system and excretion are also important areas of human attention.


By prohibiting all "patently offensive" references to sex, sexual organs, and excretion without giving adequate guidance as to what "patently offensive" means, the FCC effectively chills speech, because broadcasters have no way of knowing what the FCC will find offensive. To place any discussion of these vast topics at the broadcaster’s peril has the effect of promoting wide self-censorship of valuable material which should be completely protected under the First Amendment.

The case is likely to be reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court during its 2010-2011 session. Ironically, this ruling–the first to seriously challenge the FCC’s authority to regulate broadcast indecency, first established in Justice John Paul Stevens’ majority opinion in FCC v. Pacifica (1978)–will take place during the first session after Justice Stevens’ retirement.

Related: The First Amendment

2nd Circuit: FCC Indecency Standards Are Too Vague originally appeared on About.com Civil Liberties on Friday, July 16th, 2010 at 23:45:52.

Permalink | Comment | Email this

Civil Liberties, From The Web, Government

From The Web, Government

2nd Circuit: FCC Indecency Standards Are Too Vague originally appeared on About.com Civil Liberties on Friday, July 16th, 2010 at 23:39:35.

Permalink | Comment | Email this

From The Web, Miscellaneous, New World Order

Don Peat | Court records show she is charged with one count of conspiracy to commit mischief over $5,000. Read More: Viral Internet Video: Woman Arrested at G20 for “Assaulting” Cop with Bubbles Source: Infowars Post this to Twitter

From The Web, Government

The most moronic oxymoron I’ve ever heard is the one being cheerfully bandied about by economists as they tell us that the Great Recession of 2008-2009 is over, exulting that we’re presently experiencing a “jobless recovery.”
I don’t see how …

From The Web, Miscellaneous, New World Order

Sedalia Democrat | The U.S. Department of Defense announced Monday that Missouri will be one of 10 states to host National Guard Homeland Response Force units to help coordinate federal response to a terrorist attack. Read More: National Guard Homeland Response Force coming to Missouri Source: Infowars Post this to Twitter

From The Web, Miscellaneous, New World Order

Alex Jones & Aaron Dykes | The United States as we know it has ended. The nation has lost its credit rating with China, its Dollar reserve status and faces saddling debt and cuts in programs and services. Read More: Road Warrior-level collapse imminent: Alex Jones says we must take corrective action now Source: Infowars [...]

New World Order

They need to pro­tect their cred­it monopoly by trans­lat­ing it in­to a monopoly over all pow­er and thought. World gov­ern­ment is nec­es­sary to pre­vent any coun­try from is­su­ing their own cred­it (mon­ey) or re­pu­di­at­ing their debt. This is the New World Or­der.